<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Harvard Business Law Review (HBLR)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hblr.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hblr.org</link>
	<description>The Harvard Business Law Review (HBLR) aims to be the premier journal covering the laws of business organization and capital markets. HBLR will publish articles from professors, practitioners, and policymakers on corporate law and governance, securities and capital markets law, financial regulation and financial institutions, law and finance, financial distress and bankruptcy, and related subjects.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 01:52:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why Are Foreign Investments in Domestic Energy Projects Now Under CFIUS Scrutiny?</title>
		<link>http://www.hblr.org/2013/05/why-are-foreign-investments-in-domestic-energy-projects-now-under-cfius-scrutiny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hblr.org/2013/05/why-are-foreign-investments-in-domestic-energy-projects-now-under-cfius-scrutiny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 23:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sfreiman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFIUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese Investment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hblr.org/?p=3356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Heifetz &#038; Michael Gershberg: CFIUS now actively reviews and sometimes alters transactions that result in foreign control of U.S. energy companies. There are three primary drivers behind this recent scrutiny. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hblr.org/2013/05/why-are-foreign-investments-in-domestic-energy-projects-now-under-cfius-scrutiny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese Arbitration—Still Distinctive</title>
		<link>http://www.hblr.org/2013/04/chinese-arbitration-still-distinctive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hblr.org/2013/04/chinese-arbitration-still-distinctive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hmakeham.llm13</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chinese Outbound Investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hblr.org/?p=3326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Howell, James Rogers, and Matthew Townsend: International parties seeking to enforce contracts in the PRC have long been wary of what they often see as unfamiliar and restrictive China-seated arbitration procedures. While a recent spate of reforms has brought Chinese arbitration more into line with international best practices, foreign parties continue to exercise caution.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hblr.org/2013/04/chinese-arbitration-still-distinctive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Future of Project Bonds in Latin America</title>
		<link>http://www.hblr.org/2013/04/the-future-of-project-bonds-in-latin-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hblr.org/2013/04/the-future-of-project-bonds-in-latin-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 19:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hmakeham.llm13</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin American Legal Developments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hblr.org/?p=3302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Emil Arca: There has been an increasing interest in the use of “project bonds” in Latin America. This article explains these debt instruments and charts their rapid rise in Latin America. It then goes on to explore the challenges surrounding the expanded use of these nascent means of financing.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hblr.org/2013/04/the-future-of-project-bonds-in-latin-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Federal Reserve&#8217;s Supporting Role Behind Dodd-Frank&#8217;s Clearinghouse Reforms</title>
		<link>http://www.hblr.org/2013/04/the-federal-reserves-supporting-role-behind-dodd-franks-clearinghouse-reforms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hblr.org/2013/04/the-federal-reserves-supporting-role-behind-dodd-franks-clearinghouse-reforms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2013 12:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sfreiman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Derivatives Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dodd-Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Reserve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hblr.org/?p=3283</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Colleen Baker: Although largely overlooked, failures in PCS systems both domestically and internationally exacerbated the financial crisis of 2008. The Federal Reserve’s critical and significant role in responding to some of these disruptions has similarly been largely overlooked.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hblr.org/2013/04/the-federal-reserves-supporting-role-behind-dodd-franks-clearinghouse-reforms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unreasonable Delays: CFIUS Reviews of Energy Transactions</title>
		<link>http://www.hblr.org/2013/04/unreasonable-delays-cfius-reviews-of-energy-transactions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hblr.org/2013/04/unreasonable-delays-cfius-reviews-of-energy-transactions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2013 14:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sfreiman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFIUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hblr.org/?p=3271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joshua C. Zive: Unfortunately, delays and burdens associated with CFIUS are playing an increasingly significant and frustrating role in energy transactions. These delays frustrate the intended role of CFIUS review and make it unnecessarily difficult for energy transactions to be designed and executed in an efficient manner.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hblr.org/2013/04/unreasonable-delays-cfius-reviews-of-energy-transactions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clearinghouse Hope or Hype? Why Mandatory Clearing May Fail to Contain Systemic Risk</title>
		<link>http://www.hblr.org/2013/04/clearinghouse-hope-or-hype-why-mandatory-clearing-may-fail-to-contain-systemic-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hblr.org/2013/04/clearinghouse-hope-or-hype-why-mandatory-clearing-may-fail-to-contain-systemic-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sfreiman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Derivatives Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clearinghouses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swaps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hblr.org/?p=3261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sean J. Griffith: Clearinghouses may not be the last and best solution to the problem of systemic risk and that further regulatory experimentation may be desirable. Policy-makers should strive instead for a structure that fosters diversity and experimentation.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hblr.org/2013/04/clearinghouse-hope-or-hype-why-mandatory-clearing-may-fail-to-contain-systemic-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Margin Costs of OTC Swap Clearing Rules</title>
		<link>http://www.hblr.org/2013/04/margin-costs-of-otc-swap-clearing-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hblr.org/2013/04/margin-costs-of-otc-swap-clearing-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 15:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sfreiman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Derivatives Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clearing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derivatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swaps]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hblr.org/?p=3248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watterson, Suh &#038; Stein: Clearing requirements affect margin requirements, a key mechanism used to mitigate counterparty risk. New clearing rules may substantially costs for users of cleared derivatives because of the higher margin delivery requirements applicable to such transactions.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hblr.org/2013/04/margin-costs-of-otc-swap-clearing-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regulation of Cross-Border Swaps</title>
		<link>http://www.hblr.org/2013/04/regulation-of-cross-border-swaps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hblr.org/2013/04/regulation-of-cross-border-swaps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 03:55:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sfreiman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Derivatives Regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Business Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volume 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CFTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cross-Border]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Derivatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hblr.org/?p=3232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Felsenthal &#038; Lily Chu: We do not believe that there is any simple, one size-fits-all remedy for regulation of cross-border swaps. We propose therefore that each transaction-level requirement be considered separately, and that specific rules be adopted for each type of transaction-level requirement.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hblr.org/2013/04/regulation-of-cross-border-swaps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
